Thursday, April 17, 2008
Important Links
http://drdisarro.weebly.com
Geek of the Day Presentation
http://drdisarro.weebly.com/research-interests.html
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Investigation vs. Individualization
Personal Experiences with Online Tutoring
Thursday, April 3, 2008
In-class Discussion on Shipka
Question on Shipka:
After reading/watching Shipka’s text, do you feel that her assignments foster notions of functional, critical, and rhetorical literacy as outlined by Selber?
Answer #1
Shipka’s assignments were open ended but she did provide lots of instruction and examples of what the assignments might look like. While the students didn’t necessarily use technology , many rhetorical skills were needed to figure out the purpose of the “writing” and the modes in which the writing might appear. Selber would applaud her methods.
Answer #2
I was a little confused by some of Shipka’s assignments. In the beginning of her text I liked the discussion about open ended assignments and forcing her students to think creatively. However, I am not all to sure exactly what was going on with some of those assignments. I think there was definitely a lot of critical thinking involved in these assignments, as she notes when discussing students frustrations, but I think Selber would agree with her approach. They assignments worked on the multiple levels Selber talks about.
My Response to the Answers
I suppose I just need a little more background on what Shipka did leading up to the assignments. Did she talk to students about the purpose/use of certain technologies in certain rhetorical situations? Was there any kind of gradual transition the students previous experiences with alphabetic texts to multimodal projects? For the first question I would say yes, to the second, no. It seems like Shipka was banking on the fact that students wouldn’t be comfortable, wouldn’t necessarily know what to do with the assignment, and out of that chaos there would be excellent projects drawing upon the strength of the students.
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Shipka and Pignetti
A brief note on the Pignetti article, it was quite refreshing to read something that was not, say, littered with the “academic speak” of the McClure and Baures article (prose that I myself am horribly guilty of as well). It also made me realize the breadth of possible dissertation topics and how (as a researcher) you don’t have to completely remove yourself for your work. Pignetti seems to skim that line between traditional academic discourse, creative nonfiction, and journalism and I feel that this genre-blurring is something which (although Composition certainly allows for it more than other fields) needs to be encouraged even more.
Library Miscommunication
One thing that the readings also made me think about was how first-year composition became responsible for introducing students to college-level research…? I don’t want to sound cynical (although I am, always have been, and probably always will be), but it seems like it is our job to foster critical thinking, introduce students to rhetorically understanding various forms of communication, establish an awareness of proper citation and plagiarism, and (oh yeah) help them become better writers. Now we have to be the go-between for the library as well? What are the other fields/disciplines doing with their time and their students? It just makes me think/realize/feel that the majority of colleges and universities really do think of composition as service course, that’s all.